Choosing the Right Bonding Material for Filtration Applications

Wednesday, February 26, 2025
Share:

In the filtration industry, selecting the right bonding technology for securing media into an end cap is critical to achieving optimal performance, cost efficiency, and manufacturing throughput. Among the most commonly used bonding technologies are epoxy resins (both one-part and two-part), plastisol, and polyurethane. Each of these materials offers distinct advantages, depending on the specific application. Understanding their properties can help filtration engineers identify potential areas for cost savings and process improvements.

Epoxy Resins: High-Strength and High-Temperature Performance

Epoxy resins are often the preferred choice for applications that demand superior chemical resistance and high-temperature stability. These materials provide excellent adhesion to various substrates and offer greater mechanical strength compared to plastisol and polyurethane. However, their longer cure times at room temperature can be a drawback for high-volume production lines that require fast processing.

Polyurethane: Optimized for High-Volume Manufacturing

Polyurethanes have become increasingly popular in filtration applications due to their fast curing times and versatility. They are widely used in automated production lines where short work-in-process (WIP) times are essential. While they generally do not achieve the same level of adhesion as epoxy resins, they still offer strong bonds and adaptability to different substrates. Furthermore, advancements in polyurethane formulations have enhanced their performance, making them a compelling alternative to traditional bonding technologies.

Plastisol: A Low-Cost Option with Hidden Challenges

Plastisol has historically been a popular choice due to its low upfront material costs and ease of use as a single-component system. However, the processing requirements of plastisol introduce several hidden costs. To cure, plastisol requires prolonged exposure to temperatures exceeding 300°F, typically for at least 20-30 minutes. This necessitates the use of heat tables or ovens, which present several challenges:

  • High Energy Consumption: Sustaining elevated temperatures significantly increases energy costs.
  • Floor Space Constraints: Heat tables and curing ovens take up valuable manufacturing space that could be used more efficiently.
  • Worker Safety Concerns: Surfaces exceeding 300°F pose burn risks to operators, requiring stringent safety measures.
  • Material Wicking and Waste: The prolonged exposure to heat lowers plastisol viscosity, leading to excessive wicking into the filter media. To compensate, manufacturers often use more material than necessary, driving up costs.

Due to these drawbacks, many filter manufacturers are exploring more cost-effective and efficient alternatives to plastisol.

The Advantages of Polyurethane Over Plastisol

Recent advancements in polyurethane chemistry have provided viable solutions that address the limitations of plastisol. Two-component polyurethane systems offer several key benefits:

  • Room-Temperature Curing: Unlike plastisol, polyurethanes do not require heat for curing, eliminating the need for ovens or heat tables. This results in energy savings and frees up valuable floor space.
  • Customizable Gel Times: Polyurethane formulations can be tailored to fit specific manufacturing processes. Faster gel times help increase production throughput by allowing quicker handling and processing.
  • Reduced Material Waste: Because polyurethane does not require elevated temperatures, its viscosity remains stable during processing. This minimizes excessive wicking into the media, reducing material consumption and improving cost efficiency.
  • Compatibility with Plastic End Caps: Since polyurethanes cure without high heat, manufacturers have greater flexibility in material selection, including the option to use plastic end caps instead of metal.

Epic S7555: A High-Performance Alternative to Plastisol

Epic Resins has developed Epic S7555, a two-component polyurethane system specifically designed to replace plastisol in cartridge filter manufacturing. This formulation offers the benefits outlined above, along with additional advantages:

  • 100% Reactive System: Unlike some plastisols, Epic S7555 contains no unreacted plasticizer, eliminating concerns about leaching at elevated temperatures.
  • Low-Wear Filler: The filler material used in S7555 is low on the Mohs hardness scale, reducing wear on meter-mix dispense (MMD) equipment and extending equipment lifespan.
  • Flexible Packaging Options: Epic S7555 is available in 1-gallon pails, 5-gallon pails, 55-gallon drums, and 275-gallon totes to meet the needs of various production scales.

 

Partnering with Epic Resins for Filtration Solutions

For over six decades, Epic Resins has built a reputation as a trusted partner in the filtration industry. Our team of product development chemists works closely with customers to formulate materials that meet their exact requirements. We prioritize long-term partnerships by offering:

  • Custom Product Development
  • Technical Support and Process Optimization
  • Consistent Supply and Reliable Performance
  • Energy and Cost-Saving Solutions

By leveraging our extensive experience and continuous investment in process improvement, Epic Resins helps filtration manufacturers enhance efficiency, reduce costs, and improve overall product performance.

For more information on how Epic Resins can support your filtration applications, visit www.epicresins.com.